Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Blogs > oroborostwo > One handed writing is hard |
Porn World vs "the real one"
Porn World vs "the real one" From the grammar used in my title you can probably guess which one I think is best. If you ask the internet for pictures of lesbians we all know what you get back, the same as if you had asked for a girl only there are two of them. As the caption says "in the real world, they look nothing like this." which is unfair as some lesbians may well do. On the other hand they may just look like normal average people. This is the point, they are in the real world. If you search for girls on the internet do get predominantly attractive slim girls with good teeth and hair. It is the same for print media and TV, society promotes hot over "normal" every days of the week. However if you search for "nude girls" you are finding images not just promoted by society in general but one aimed at<b> men looking </font></b>for porn. So is it any wonder that images of lesbains found online are any less biased towards the taste of men? I really don't think that genuine lesbains take time producing photos and video for men to jerk off to. They may well produce porn to get women wet and horny but it's not likely to be found on porn sites containing mainly straight content for guys. Now I'm not going to be stupid enough to try and tell you what lesbian porn is or what lesbian's like to watch. However what I will say is it doesn't involve a guy walking in half way through and shoving his coke in any available hole. You'd think they would notice and not be too happy! So how do you refer to the type of porn I like to blow my load to? I love to see girls fucking each other; the more tit's and pussy's on display the happier and harder I get. I only see three options: 1. Real lesbian's that are hot enough to make guys hard and are happy to be jerked off to at. 2. Hot girl's paid to fuck each other who can fake looking interested in pussy even though they don't like it. 3. Real bisexual girls working in the porn industry who are fucking girls in a way to make watching guys cum. All the posing is set so the wanking guy gets the best view in the house. About as real as any other porn then! But This is not lesbian porn. Don't get me wrong, I would go fully erect and produce a hot creamy stream if I did see real lesbains fucking as long as I found at least one of them hot. However the three options above can not be called "lesbian porn" it can be called bisexual girls at best and straight girls paid to suck clit at worse. Not saying lesbains would not enjoy it but it is mislabeled. It maybe that the more actuate descriptions listed above take too long to type when you are desperate to let your jizz fly! So here are some "Probably not lesbian, possibly bisexual but definitely being paid girls; fucking each other." Girl getting fucked no cock needed. Double penetration, isn't anal what men want and women rarely volunteer for? Playing into male fantasy of women taking care of the foreplay. Pleasuring three girls with one weapon at the same time, come on.... So any of these aimed at lesbian women? Still glad that they are aimed at me! Check out my blog and profile! |
||||
|
Nicely written. That last photo looks dangerous.
| |||
|
men need porn because they don't get laid . women, lesbian or not , can have the real thing whenever wanted, so of course, "lesbian porn" is for men
|
Become a member to create a blog